ov90 cells (ATCC)
Structured Review

Ov90 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 409 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ov90 cells/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 409 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "DNA Copy Number Profiling in Extracellular Vesicles as Clinical Biomarkers of High‐Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma"
Article Title: DNA Copy Number Profiling in Extracellular Vesicles as Clinical Biomarkers of High‐Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma
Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
doi: 10.1002/jev2.70308
Figure Legend Snippet: EV‐DNA as companion biomarker for PARP inhibitor treatment. (a) IC50 values of Kuramochi, OV90, and COV362 cells for olaparib. Kuramochi cells were classified as sensitive, OV90 cells as intermediate, and COV362 cells as resistant. (b) CNV status for sEV‐DNA from Kuramochi (sensitive), OV90 (intermediate), and COV362 (resistant) cells. (c) PCA of CNV profiles for responders and nonresponders. (d) Hierarchical clustering and heatmap showing the CNV profiles of responders and nonresponders. The copy number values were normalized to those of normal ovarian tissue derived from FFPE samples, with normal copy number defined as 1. The color scale represents relative copy number values, where values greater than 1 are shown in red (copy number gain), whereas values less than 1 are shown in blue (copy number loss). (e) CV scores showing the predictive performance of the 30‐gene panel. (f) Heatmap for the top 5 genes of CV scores. (g–i) ROC curves and AUC values for the selected gene panels. (g) Top 5 genes ranked by CV score. (h) Combination of NOTCH3 and CSMD3 using LASSO analysis. (i) Combination of ARID1A, NOTCH3, CSMD3, ELP4, and BARD1 using LASSO analysis. The green area represents the 95% confidence interval (CI), and AUC values are shown with corresponding CIs. (j) Copy numbers of the top 5 genes of CV scores for sEV‐DNA in ascites from patients with HGSOC who received olaparib as maintenance therapy. (k) Predictive scores of LASSO2 and LASSO5 for patients with HGSOC who received olaparib as maintenance therapy. The respective prediction equations were LASSO2: 0.2133 × NOTCH3 + 0.1967 × CSMD3 + 0.7894 and LASSO5: 0.24758 × ARID1A + 1.60957 × NOTCH3 + 1.95855 × CSMD3 + 0.02955 × ELP4 + 0.11231 × BARD1 – 2.6119. When the value of the equation is >0, the patient's prognosis is considered good; when it is <0, the prognosis is considered poor.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Derivative Assay


